Within Durham UFOs
How Official Logs Shape Durham UFO History
The official logs help map County Durham's UFO record, but old county labels and thin descriptions require careful reading.
On this page
- What the Mo D tables record and omit
- Historic county boundaries and confusing labels
- How logs, FOI checks and local press fit together
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
County Durham’s Ministry of Defence UFO record is useful, but it is not a neat county catalogue. The official tables list dates, times, towns, counties, witness occupations where known, and short descriptions, yet they rarely include the original witness statements, investigation notes, weather checks, radar results, photographs, or final explanations. That matters because Durham’s UFO history sits across awkward geography: historic County Durham, modern County Durham, Darlington, Hartlepool, Sunderland, Gateshead, Teesside and Tyne and Wear can all appear differently depending on which map, archive, police force, newspaper or MoD table is being used. GOV.UK’s published UFO reports cover 1997 to 2009 and describe themselves as UK-wide lists showing “dates and times, location and a brief description of the sighting”, not full case files. [GOV.UK]GOV.UKUF O reports in the UKUF O reports in the UK
Read carefully, the logs do not prove a hidden Durham UFO mystery. They do something more modest and more useful: they show where reports entered the official system, what witnesses said in compressed form, and where later researchers need to check boundaries, local archives, aviation context and Freedom of Information responses before treating a sighting as a strong case.
What the MoD tables record and omit
The public MoD sighting tables are structured like an index rather than an investigation file. The GOV.UK page gathers yearly PDFs from 1997 to 2009, with columns such as date, time, town or village, county, occupation of reporter where known, and a short description. That format is valuable for mapping repeated reports, but it strips each sighting down to a few lines. It can show that a report was received; it usually cannot show whether it was checked against aircraft, lanterns, planets, weather, radar or local events. [GOV.UK]GOV.UKUF O reports in the UKUF O reports in the UK
The National Archives gives the wider reason for caution. It says MoD records have been kept since the 1960s, that most reports describe shapes, lights and flashes, and that many can often be explained. It also notes that earlier files may include letters and replies suggesting possible explanations such as Venus, high-altitude aircraft, weather balloons and satellites, while later files often contain one-off sightings and many reports of lights rather than clear craft. [The National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukThe National Archives UFO reportsThe National Archives UFO reports
That distinction is crucial for County Durham. A log entry is not a verdict of “unknown craft”. It is a record that somebody reported something they could not identify, and that the report was logged by the MoD system. The stronger the entry’s detail — exact time, direction, duration, witness role, multiple witnesses, aviation context — the more useful it becomes. But even then, a short table entry cannot carry the evidential weight of a full investigation.
The best-known Durham examples in the tables show both the value and the weakness of the format. On 29 July 2006, the MoD table records two Seaham entries. One at 22:40 describes nine orange balls of light following each other and drifting northwards for about five minutes. Another, at 22:00 and marked “Police Officer”, describes six yellow-orange lights travelling in a line or slightly staggered formation from south to north. [GOV.UK Assets]assets.publishing.service.gov.ukUK AssetsUK Assets
Those two entries are more interesting than a lone “UFO seen” report because they share location, date, colour and general movement. They suggest either multiple reports of the same broad event or a short local cluster. Yet they remain thin. The table does not show whether the two times came from independent clocks, whether the reports were made immediately, whether the officer was on duty, whether other police logs survive, or whether the lights matched lantern releases, aircraft, astronomical objects or another mundane source.
The same issue appears in the 2007 Houghton-le-Spring entry. The MoD table records that on 13 August 2007 at 22:45, two objects of the same brightness were reported as slow and erratic, changing direction, slowing suddenly and stopping. It is a striking description, but it is still only a compressed table line, not a full case file. [GOV.UK Assets]assets.publishing.service.gov.ukUK AssetsUK Assets
Why Durham’s boundaries make simple maps misleading
County Durham is unusually easy to mis-map if a UFO database uses modern administrative labels without checking historic geography. The Durham County Record Office describes its map holdings as covering the historic County Durham before 1974 “between the Rivers Tyne and Tees” as well as the present county. Its interactive map guidance says the historical layers cover the pre-1974 County Durham boundary, plus Startforth Rural District in North Yorkshire, which now lies within the current County Durham boundary. [durhamrecordoffice.org.uk]durhamrecordoffice.org.ukOpen source on durhamrecordoffice.org.uk.
For a historic-county project, this matters immediately. Places such as Gateshead, South Shields, Sunderland and parts of the north-eastern coalfield belong naturally to historic County Durham, even though modern readers often associate them with Tyne and Wear. Hartlepool and Stockton raise the opposite problem: they sit in Tees-side administrative and media worlds but have historic Durham relevance. Darlington is also a frequent edge case because it is a borough in the ceremonial county area and is tied to Teesside’s airport corridor.
The MoD tables sometimes help by listing “County Durham” beside the town. The 2006 Seaham entries do that clearly, and the 2009 Darlington entry also appears under County Durham. [GOV.UK Assets]assets.publishing.service.gov.ukUK AssetsUK Assets But a researcher should not assume that every historically Durham sighting will be labelled that way. A table, newspaper article or police disclosure might use the contemporary administrative county, the police-force area, a postal town, a regional label such as “Teesside” or “North East”, or no county at all.
This is where the project’s historic-county frame earns its keep. The question is not simply “did the MoD write County Durham in the county column?” It is “where did the sighting occur in relation to historic County Durham, modern councils, police-force areas, airports, archives and local newspapers?” A Durham UFO map that ignores those layers will undercount some relevant reports and over-simplify others.
The Seaham problem: a strong log entry, a weak paper trail
The Seaham 2006 pair is a useful test case because it looks promising at first glance. Two entries appear on the same night, in the same town, with similar orange or yellow-orange lights moving northwards. One is attributed to a police officer, which naturally raises reader interest because police witnesses are often treated as more careful observers than anonymous members of the public. [GOV.UK Assets]assets.publishing.service.gov.ukUK AssetsUK Assets
However, the evidential step from “police officer listed in a MoD table” to “well-investigated police case” is large. A later Freedom of Information request to Durham Constabulary asked for documents, records, reports, correspondence or other material relating to the 29 July 2006 Seaham report by a police officer. The request quoted the publicly recorded MoD details: six yellow-orange lights travelling in a line or slightly staggered from south to north. [WhatDoTheyKnow]whatdotheyknow.comWhat Do They KnowUFO Sighting Report (Seaham, 29 July 2006) - a Freedom of Information request to Durham Constabulary - WhatDoTheyKnow…
That kind of follow-up is exactly what a careful Durham researcher should do, because it tests whether the short MoD entry has a supporting local record. A police-linked line in a national table might derive from a formal incident log, a phone call passed to the MoD, a witness occupation field, or a later summary whose underlying local paperwork was not retained. If the local force does not hold a surviving record, the sighting is not disproved; but it is weakened as an evidentially rich case.
The likely explanation question also remains open but not mysterious in a dramatic sense. The Seaham descriptions — multiple orange lights, silent movement, loose line or staggered formation, short duration, northward drift — are the same kind of pattern that the National Archives later associated with the late-2000s rise in Chinese-lantern reports. In its final UFO-file release, The National Archives noted that many reports of formations of orange lights moving slowly across the sky described the appearance of Chinese lanterns, even though witnesses did not recognise them at the time. [National Archives]cdn.nationalarchives.gov.ukNational Archives
That does not prove the Seaham lights were lanterns. It does mean the entry belongs in the “interesting but vulnerable” category: multiple reports make it worth recording, but the short descriptions fit a common late-2000s explanation and lack the supporting detail needed to keep the case strong.
Darlington and the airport corridor
The 3 May 2009 Darlington entry shows a different kind of boundary puzzle. The MoD table records two bright orange-red lights moving towards Durham Tees Valley Airport, flying steady, level and straight. [GOV.UK Assets]assets.publishing.service.gov.ukufo report 2009ufo report 2009 That one line sits at the meeting point of County Durham geography, Teesside aviation, and the MoD’s last year of UFO logging.
The airport reference is important because it gives the reader a practical line of inquiry. If lights were reported moving towards an airport, the obvious checks would include aircraft movements, approach and departure paths, helicopter traffic, airfield lighting, weather, wind direction, and possible lantern drift. The MoD table does not show those checks. It simply preserves the witness’s description and the aviation landmark that framed it.
It also illustrates why place names can mislead. “Durham Tees Valley Airport” was a branding used for Teesside International Airport during that period, and the airport’s history records that it was renamed Durham Tees Valley Airport in 2004 before returning to the Teesside International name in 2019. The airport itself began as RAF Middleton St George, later becoming a civil airport. [CIHT]ciht.org.ukCIHTDurham Tees Valley AirportCIHTDurham Tees Valley Airport
So a reader might file the 2009 Darlington report under Durham because the MoD table says County Durham, under Teesside because of the airport and regional media context, or under aviation-linked sightings because the report explicitly points towards an airport. None of those readings is wholly wrong. The mistake would be to treat one label as if it settled the case.
How FOI checks and local press change the evidence
For County Durham, the most useful follow-up evidence often comes from asking what survives outside the MoD table. Freedom of Information requests can confirm whether a police force holds matching incident logs. Local press can show whether a sighting became a public story at the time or was only noticed later when MoD files were released. Local archives can clarify whether a place should be treated as historic Durham, modern Durham, Teesside or Tyne and Wear for the purpose of mapping.
The Chronicle’s 2012 North East UFO history piece, for example, retold the 29 July 2006 Durham-area entries using the same key details: six yellow-orange lights travelling in a staggered line from south to north, followed forty minutes later by nine orange balls drifting northwards. [Chronicle Live]chroniclelive.co.ukhistory ufo sightings north east 1367686history ufo sightings north east 1367686 That adds public visibility, but it does not by itself add new investigation. It appears to be reporting from the released official records rather than presenting fresh witness interviews, photographs or technical checks.
FOI material has a different value. Durham Constabulary’s own FOI page explains that the Freedom of Information Act gives a general right of access to recorded information held by public authorities, subject to exemptions, and that responses should normally be handled within the statutory timescale. [Durham Police]durham.police.ukOpen source on police.uk. A successful FOI search for a matching police incident log could strengthen a case by adding time of call, caller role, location, dispatch notes or cross-references. A “not held” outcome does not prove the sighting never happened; it simply means the local record is not available from that body in response to that request.
That difference should shape how County Durham UFO cases are ranked. The strongest cases are not just the strangest-sounding lines. They are the ones where the MoD entry can be matched to independent local reporting, original witness accounts, aviation records, weather data, police or emergency-service logs, photographs with metadata, or credible later investigation. Many Durham entries do not reach that level.
What the MoD closure tells us about Durham reports
The MoD stopped collecting UFO reports in 2009, which makes the County Durham official-log period finite. The National Archives’ final release said the last 25 files covered the final two years of the UFO desk and that reports had trebled in its last year. It also said the files recorded the reasoning that the desk served no defence purpose, and that in more than 50 years no report to the MoD had revealed evidence of an extra-terrestrial presence or military threat to the UK. [National Archives]cdn.nationalarchives.gov.ukNational Archives
A 2024 parliamentary answer confirmed that the MoD’s position remained unchanged: the department ceased investigating UFO or UAP reports in 2009, had not classified new material on the subject since, and had no current plan to create a dedicated team. It also stated that all MoD UFO files created up to 2009 had been released to The National Archives. [UK Parliament]questions-statements.parliament.ukUK Parliament Written questions and answersUK Parliament Written questions and answers
For Durham, that means modern reports will not appear in the same official MoD sequence. After 2009, researchers must rely more heavily on police FOI disclosures, local news, aviation data, amateur astronomy checks, social media evidence and witness interviews. That shift can create an illusion that UFO activity has changed, when the bigger change may simply be the reporting route.
The late-2000s surge also makes Durham’s 2006 to 2009 entries easier to interpret. Seaham’s orange-light cluster and Darlington’s orange-red airport-direction report sit within a national period when the MoD and The National Archives were dealing with many reports of orange lights, summer sightings and possible lantern-related events. [National Archives]cdn.nationalarchives.gov.ukNational Archives That does not erase local interest, but it stops the Durham entries being read in isolation.
A practical way to read County Durham entries
The safest way to use the MoD logs is as a starting grid, not a final answer. For each County Durham or historically Durham entry, the reader should ask five questions.
First, what geography is being used? Seaham is straightforwardly County Durham in the table; Houghton-le-Spring is historically Durham but modern Tyne and Wear; Darlington can point towards County Durham, Teesside and an airport corridor at the same time. Durham Record Office’s pre-1974 and present-county map distinction is a useful guardrail here. [durhamrecordoffice.org.uk]durhamrecordoffice.org.ukOpen source on durhamrecordoffice.org.uk.
Second, what exactly was reported? Lights, colours, direction and duration matter more than the word “UFO”. The difference between “a strange object was seen” and “six yellow-orange lights travelling in a staggered line from south to north” is the difference between a vague entry and a checkable pattern.
Third, is there independent support? Two similar Seaham entries on one night are more useful than one isolated line, but they still need local records or witness detail before becoming a strong case. [GOV.UK Assets]assets.publishing.service.gov.ukUK AssetsUK Assets
Fourth, are ordinary explanations being considered? Lanterns, aircraft, satellites, planets, meteors, airships, weather balloons and local events are not dismissive afterthoughts; they are the obvious comparison set identified in official archival guidance and final-file commentary. [The National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukThe National Archives UFO reportsThe National Archives UFO reports
Finally, what does the table omit? The MoD entry may not include the original wording, witness identity, weather, direction of wind, radar status, police incident number, photographs, or any final assessment. Those gaps are not small technicalities. They are the difference between a sighting being historically interesting and evidentially strong.
What the logs really add to Durham UFO history
The MoD records give County Durham’s UFO history a documentary spine. They show that reports from Seaham, Houghton-le-Spring, Darlington and other nearby places entered the national system, and they help identify years, clusters and recurring descriptions. They also show how much of the county’s record consists of brief night-time lights rather than close encounters or investigated aviation incidents.
Their greatest value is comparative. The Durham entries can be set against national patterns, especially the late-2000s rise in orange-light reports. They can also be compared across neighbouring mapped areas: Tyne and Wear for historically Durham towns north of the modern county, Teesside for Hartlepool, Stockton and airport-linked reports, and North Yorkshire or Cumbria where Pennine and Tees-side sightings cross familiar boundaries.
Their greatest weakness is the same feature that makes them easy to browse: compression. A few words in a table can preserve a witness’s moment of puzzlement, but they can also flatten uncertainty, remove context and encourage over-reading. County Durham’s MoD UFO record is therefore best treated as a map of reported claims, not a map of proven anomalies. It matters because it tells researchers where to look next, and because it shows how official records, local geography and boundary history shape what later readers think Durham’s UFO past actually contains.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Official Logs Shape Durham UFO History. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs
Focuses on government, military, and documentary evidence rather than folklore alone.
Need to Know
Explores military and intelligence records, complementing discussion of MoD logs and official reporting systems.
The UFO Files
Directly addresses British UFO reports, government files, archives, and how official records shape UFO narratives.
The UFO Encyclopedia
Provides context for evaluating sightings, sources, case documentation, and historical reporting practices.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: GOV.UK
Title: UF O reports in the UK
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ufo-reports-in-the-uk -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: The National Archives UFO reports
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/explore-the-collection/explore-by-time-period/postwar/ufo-reports/ -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: UK Assets
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78be15ed915d07d35b2145/UFOReports2006WholeoftheUK.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: UK Assets
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78a53fed915d04220643b2/ufo_report_2007.pdf -
Source: durhamrecordoffice.org.uk
Link: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/our-records/maps/ -
Source: durhamrecordoffice.org.uk
Title: Search interactive maps
Link: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/search-options/search-interactive-maps/ -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: ufo report 2009
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7582c440f0b6397f35efcb/ufo_report_2009.pdf -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: What Do They Know
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ufo_sighting_report_seaham_29_juSource snippet
UFO Sighting Report (Seaham, 29 July 2006) - a Freedom of Information request to Durham Constabulary - WhatDoTheyKnow...
Published: July 2006
-
Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: National Archives
Link: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/final-tranche-of-UFO-files-released.pdf -
Source: ciht.org.uk
Title: CIHTDurham Tees Valley Airport
Link: https://www.ciht.org.uk/media/8058/durham_tees_valley_airport.pdf -
Source: durham.police.uk
Link: https://www.durham.police.uk/police-forces/durham-constabulary/areas/about-us/about-us/freedom-of-information-requests/ -
Source: questions-statements.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament Written questions and answers
Link: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-12-05/18321/ -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: defe 241948
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/state-secrets/mysteries/defe-241948/ -
Source: media.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://media.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php/ufo-file-release-may-2008/ -
Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: aug 2009 highlights guide
Link: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/aug-2009-highlights-guide.pdf -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/ -
Source: images.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://images.nationalarchives.gov.uk/asset/76305/ -
Source: discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C12738165 -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: defe 241948 2
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/state-secrets/mysteries/defe-241948-2/ -
Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/ufo-video-transcript.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/326699/41670_Cm_8897_Print_Ready.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk Hartlepool
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68779cbe2bad77c3dae4dc74/Hartlepool.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: UK Sea Fisheries Statistics 2019 access checked 002
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f6b4534d3bf7f7238f2311d/UK_Sea_Fisheries_Statistics_2019_-_access_checked-002.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7448/1622442.pdf -
Source: ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk Dataset
Link: https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/?_license_id_limit=0&_organization_limit=0&organization=uttlesford-district-council&res_format=HTML -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: ufo report 2008
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a789e38ed915d042206403a/ufo_report_2008.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d2dc667e5274a14e426cff3/20171221_Collections_level_catalogue_by_Welsh_and_Webb.pdf -
Source: ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk Durham County Council
Link: https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/organization/d3bb54b5-4289-4ff9-9546-ff95442643fc?res_format=PDF&tags=population -
Source: ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk1 dataset found
Link: https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/?_res_format_limit=0&_tags_limit=0&res_format=application%2Fgml%2Bxml&tags=Agricultural+and+aquaculture+facilities -
Source: ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk Durham County Council
Link: https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/?_license_id_limit=0&_organization_limit=0&license_id=cc-by&organization=durham-county-council&tags=Geographical+names -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: ufo report 1997
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a758d2fe5274a6faebebd11/ufo_report_1997.pdf -
Source: ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk Durham County Council
Link: https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/?organization=durham-county-council&res_format=PDF&tags=economy -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78cd1d40f0b6324769a45e/UFOReport2000.pdf -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78e38de5274a2acd18a91f/UFOReport1998.pdf -
Source: ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: publishing.service.gov.uk Durham County Council
Link: https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/?_res_format_limit=0&organization=durham-county-council -
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a79bcace5274a684690bbc2/UFOReport1999.pdf -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: Durham Constabulary
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/durham_police/unsuccessful -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: ufo sighting report bromley 17 n 2
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ufo_sighting_report_bromley_17_n_2 -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: ufo sighting report wolsingham 4
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ufo_sighting_report_wolsingham_4 -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: UF O/UAP sightings
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ufouap_sightings_14 -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: ufo sighting report whitechapel
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ufo_sighting_report_whitechapel -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: Durham Constabulary
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/durham_police -
Source: whatdotheyknow.com
Title: Operation Lacklan
Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/operation_lacklan -
Source: durhamrecordoffice.org.uk
Title: Maps and plans This guide gives a broad
Link: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/our-records/information-guides/maps-and-plans/ -
Source: durhamrecordoffice.org.uk
Link: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/search-options/ -
Source: news.sky.com
Title: ufo desk why mod shut real life x files 10442364
Link: https://news.sky.com/story/ufo-desk-why-mod-shut-real-life-x-files-10442364 -
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Official documents Find official documents from government
Link: https://www.gov.uk/official-documents -
Source: GOV.UK
Title: celebrating the historic counties of england
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/celebrating-the-historic-counties-of-england/celebrating-the-historic-counties-of-england -
Source: boundarycommissionforengland.independent.gov.uk
Link: https://boundarycommissionforengland.independent.gov.uk/review2023/b65f7782-658b-4c4a-9cba-59c16c807f77/a0-maps/A0_RP_NE_Portrait_Final.pdf -
Source: durham.police.uk
Title: Durham Constabulary: Home Your local police force
Link: https://www.durham.police.uk/ -
Source: durham.police.uk
Link: https://www.durham.police.uk/rqo/request/ri/request-information/rip/request-information-police/ -
Source: maps.durham.gov.uk
Link: https://maps.durham.gov.uk/OLBasic2/Index.aspx?appid=72 -
Source: durham-pcc.gov.uk
Title: freedom of information
Link: https://www.durham-pcc.gov.uk/transparency/freedom-of-information -
Source: essex.police.uk
Title: ufo reports 2014 to 2024
Link: https://www.essex.police.uk/foi-ai/essex-police/other-information/previous-foi-requests/ufo-reports-2014-to-2024/ -
Source: northyorkshire.police.uk
Title: foi 0198 202526 ufo sightings
Link: https://northyorkshire.police.uk/foi-ai/north-yorkshire-police/foi-disclosure-2021-22/june-2025/foi-0198-202526-ufo-sightings/ -
Source: westyorkshire.police.uk
Link: https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/freedom-of-information/july-2021-foi-763104-21-joe-mccaffrey -
Source: police.uk
Link: https://www.police.uk/pu/your-area/durham-constabulary/seahameasington-seaham-north/ -
Source: broughton-astley.gov.uk
Link: https://www.broughton-astley.gov.uk/documents?page=64&tagcategories=Reports -
Source: data.jncc.gov.uk
Title: pubs csuk region 05
Link: https://data.jncc.gov.uk/data/6473ed35-d1cb-428e-ad69-eb81d6c52045/pubs-csuk-region-05.pdf -
Source: seaham.gov.uk
Link: https://www.seaham.gov.uk/images/The-Council/seaham-town-guide.pdf -
Source: chroniclelive.co.uk
Title: history ufo sightings north east 1367686
Link: https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/history-ufo-sightings-north-east-1367686 -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: County Durham
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_Durham -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/RealCounties/photos/youve-probably-been-toldgateshead-jarrow-south-shields-and-sunderland-used-to-be/1292154839734747/ -
Source: scribd.com
Title: ufo report 2009 pdf
Link: https://www.scribd.com/document/446684700/ufo-report-2009-pdf -
Source: chroniclelive.co.uk
Title: encounters of the toon kind 1554720
Link: https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/encounters-of-the-toon-kind-1554720 -
Source: valentine.dur.ac.uk
Link: https://valentine.dur.ac.uk/pip/background/technical/county.html
Additional References
-
Source: gazetteer.org.uk
Link: https://gazetteer.org.uk/County_Durham_Portrait.pdf -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/adafruitindustries/posts/declassified-drawings-from-the-british-governments-ufo-desk/10156001362427578/ -
Source: abcounties.com
Link: https://abcounties.com/counties/county-profiles/county_durham/ -
Source: gazetteer.org.uk
Link: https://gazetteer.org.uk/place/Durham -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/BeamishLivingMuseum/posts/if-you-spot-any-ufos-around-beamish-make-sure-to-report-any-sightings-to-our-pol/1243953641105434/ -
Source: 1066.co.nz
Link: https://www.1066.co.nz/Mosaic%20DVD/whoswho/text/County_Durham%5B1%5D.htm -
Source: wikishire.co.uk
Link: https://wikishire.co.uk/wiki/County_Durham -
Source: facebook.com
Title: i honestly have no idea what it could have been a potential ufo sighting has bee
Link: https://www.facebook.com/EchoTeessideNews/posts/i-honestly-have-no-idea-what-it-could-have-been-a-potential-ufo-sighting-has-bee/1186159506843107/ -
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Title: File:Still from VHS footage of UFO sent to the British Ministry of Defence.jpg
Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AStill_from_VHS_footage_of_UFO_sent_to_the_British_Ministry_of_Defence.jpg -
Source: keranews.org
Title: britains national archives releases documents detailing work of ufo desk
Link: https://www.keranews.org/2012-07-12/britains-national-archives-releases-documents-detailing-work-of-ufo-desk
Topic Tree